About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 16 of about 17
drone technology -- demonstrates how prevalent drone technology is being affected. they can be purchased online for a few hundred dollars and then equipped with high definition video cameras without being detected. it is not hard to imagine the serious privacy problems this type of technology could cause. a state like mine, vermont, we protect and guard our privacy. this is raising some very serious questions from people from the far right to the far left. o we can't take a shortsighted view. technology in this area will advance at incredible rate. so i hope this hearing will just be the beginning of the dialogue. to help this committee explore some of these issues, senator grassley and i have invited witnesses who will testify. we'll hear from law enforcement officials as a fully operational unmanned unit. we'll hear from the leading unmanned vehicle industry group. a representative electronic privacy information center. and a scholar who has studied the intersection of drone technology. i appreciate them being here. senator grassley. >> before going to my statement, listening to you, i
technology to detect what this might be. i am sorry we did not get to that point. the very fact that we have -- i will not do anything to my good friend, let me clear the record, or anything on an airplane -- we cannot in any way suggest that someone with some sort of mental sort of situation that brings about the tragedy, some series of incidents that we have had with an airline pilot who had some sort of medical emergency that required him to be tied down -- generally , airing, domestic flights marshals are there, but nobody knows what the schedule is -- i want to leave at that. here is my final point to this mr. chairman. my final point is, it is very difficult for me to believe that we do not have mandatory training for our flight , that the solution will be that we add a voluntary hours -- you can ask me whether you have the money to voluntarily train them -- the fact that you are allowing a weapon can cause a terrible injury, and you are allowing it to come on without pausing for a moment with the concerns of members of congress. i would like us to go back to the drawing table. i would
. it's very exciting in terms of the technology and the rest that is available to us to make real time information available for everyone to make our country healthier. if we had never had any problem with health care delivery systems or insurance denying care, it would have been absolutely necessary for us to pass the affordable care act because of the status quo was unsustainable financially. unsustainable for individuals, for families, for local government, state and federal government, unsustainable for large corporations. it's a competitiveness issue for our business community. and again federal government to go back unsustainable for our budget. you see by the report of the c.b.o., nonpartisan congressional budget office that already a large part due to the affordable care act, there's been a slow down in the increase of health care costs. that was one of our goals in the legislation. medicare has .4%, we talked about that before. medicaid, no increase. and that's very important to the affordable care act, it's very important to medicare and medicaid. it's very important to the a
, substantive actions, the demographic partners, campaign mechanics, technology, and the primary process. i want to point out that the recommendations are not limited to those five areas are even to the rnc. they can all learn something from this report. each of them is going to have a role to play. we are in the campaign business. our task will be to reach out to the most voters and build the best infrastructure ever. the policy aspects are most valuable for candidates. voters of all races and backgrounds need to understand that our policies offer a chance for a brighter future. the report offered some specific areas where republicans fell short. the are some ways the voters have been turned off. it highlighted republican innovation among our governors that have won over a new voters. it provides no ideas for the way forward. our candidates should take those recommendations to heart just as i have a. have a valuable role to play. the rnc will always be the leader in campaign mechanics. should takeallies it capabilities that can supplement our efforts in certain areas, voter registration, resear
our domestic demand. today new technologies have enabled us to access previously inaccessible energy resources, and almost overnight america's energy resource picture flipped from deficit to surplus. in the past five years we've become stronger as a nation through the developed of these god-given resources. as a result we are more competitive. from low income to the high tax brackets, everyone is benefiting. the future's bright but only if we educate the half truths and begin telling the real story of america's natural gas revolution. the stories about technology, private sector innovation, investment, financial risk, thousands of new jobs, new competition, new growth, a growing and better standard of living for more americans, lower energy costs, new industries, a revitalized energy sector, more jobs, more growth, energy security and optimism. this is the story of america's natural gas revolution. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the entleman's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentlelady from illinois seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent to address the house
in terms of the technology that is available to us to make real- time information available to help make our country healthier. if we had never had any problem with health care delivery systems or insurance, denying care, it would have been absolutely necessary for us to pass the affordable care act, because of the status quo with unsustainable costs financially, unsustainable for individuals, families, local and state governments, for large corporations, it is a competitiveness issue for our and and unsustainable for our government. you see by the report of the cbo, the nonpartisan congressional budget office, that a large part due to the affordable care act there has been a slowdown in the increase of health care costs, and that was one of our goals in the legislation. aboutre is .4%, we talked that before, medicaid, no increase, and that is very import for the federal care act, very important medicare and medicaid, very important to the american people and the great middle class. already, there is no denial of care for pre-existing conditions for 17 million children. starting next yea
of the four missiles space activity center and later director of science and technology at the cia was pleased because to get more technical analysis. he is turning my great technical assistance into english. i raised remember him calling me in and saying you will is remembered as the guy that writes peter rabbit -- peter rabbit english. the difficulty of assessing egyptian intentions, office of cyanide 1973. you must remember the conduct military exercises in may and august causing military mobilization twice at great cost to tele-tv. i recall working with the head of the middle east and south asian branch at office of strategic research to ensure we have a right kind of collection. technical, human. so we have the requirements out. welle understood pretty the so but rigid soviet military shipments. we did not always know the content. content of what was in the shipments, but we knew they were very sizable back in those years. of egyptiannding and syrian forces in those locations was only fair. our son did -- our own understanding of the military intentions were very poor. real- time we lack
that information or to lay down and memory. we don't know how that works. with technology yet to be invented, this will develop. a lot of this will be nano- technology. fromybe have to record hundreds of brain cells at the same time and be able to understand how these circuits work. that is the brain activity that about.g talked we are very -- we're in very early days. it is getting to be a very exciting moment to put something together that we could not have thought about more with the nih director tonight at 8:00. >> this morning, a discussion on president obama's trip to the middle east. then, senior white house correspondent will discuss the history and importance of id
the benefit of health information technology. it addresses the sose yo economic determinants of health beginning with the 10-20-30 program to reduce poverty. it will reduce health care spending in the medium and long-term. it's a masterpiece of a budget and i urge everyone vote for it. yes, we will not be happy until every american has access to quality health care. i yield back. the chair: the time the gentlelady has expire thsmed gentleman from georgia. mr. broun: what time remains on both sides? the chair: the gentleman from georgia has three minutes remain, the gentleman from virginia has fife and a half minutes remaining. -- as five and a half minutes remaining. the gentleman from georgia has the right to close. mr. broun: may i inquire of my friend how many more speakers he has? mr. scott: i think we have two ore speakers including myself. mr. broun: we reserve. the chair: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from virginia. mr. scott: i yield two minutes to the gentlelady from -- to the gentlelady, ms. waters. the chair: the gentlelady is recognized. ms. waters: as a member of t
that the technology is going to fix the problem, i believe the evidence suggests that it is not. the gentleman in the blue tie. >> i worked as the united nations spokesman in iraq for five years. i wanted to comment on the hundreds of billions of dollars that was wasted under something called the project reconstruction teams. they would start something and it never goes forward. never would it be completed. where did the money go? >> won the reasons that we wrote the book was that people had the sense that we are spending a lot, but it's very difficult to get your arms around what that means. when it comes to the reconstruction money, that is particularly hard to think about. just to put it in context, in afghanistan we spent $87 billion on afghani reconstruction, most of which the pentagon, as they put it, had lost visibility on it. compare that to the national park where we spend $2.5 billion a year to support all of the national parks. if you ask most americans, they would say that is a bad allocation of resources. national parks versus -- the u.s. portion of the reconstruction funding has
in memory. we don't know how that works. with technologies yet to be invented, a lot of this is going to be technology development, a lot of it will be nanotechnology, what we aim to do is be able to record from thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of brain cells at the same time, be able therefore to underis stand how these circuits work. that's the brain activity map that's being talked about. very early days we don't really have a scientific plan about milestones and timetables and costs, but it's getting to be a very exciting moment to put something together that we couldn't have thought of. >> more with n.i.h. director dr. francis collins, sunday night at :00 on c-span's "q&a." off the floor of the u.s. senate report that democrats are dropping the assault weapons ban from their gun bill, making the approval of the bill -- ban unlikely. the c.q. congressional quarterly reports that senator dianne feinstein of california all but conceded today that the assault weapons banshee has spent months urging congress to renew will not become law. saying quote i very much regret it, i tri
of citizenship in many parts of the middle east. at the same time advanced technologies are proliferating down and out. military's now have intercontinental ballistic missiles. cyber has reached a point where ases can be as destructive bombs. our home where land is not the sanctuary at once was. unlike that famous story of a fisherman in the tale of the arabian nights, which will not be putting that genie back in the bottle. mayhem is here to stay. but money is not pick in a -- thehave begun to deductible on our insurance policy has gone up. we understand why. our nation is going to an historic fiscal correction. we're working to restore the economic foundation of our power, and we need to do this. deficit reduction is a national security apparent. but we need to be -- we need to be a lot smarter about how we go about it. it is worth noting we have not had a budget since the time -- since i became the chairman of the joint chiefs and some time before that. sequestration is the most irresponsible way possible to manage the nation's defense. it is actually the antithesis of what we need. when th
in technology and innovation, invest to take to make america a leader in the 21st century. if you invest in our economy, then you'll increase jobs for the american worker. if you increase the jobs available to the american worker, consumer demand will increase. if consumer demand increases, the economy will grow, and if the economy grows, the deficit will decline and so too will our debt as a percentage of g.d.p. this is decision time in america, and clearly the best decision that we can make is a balanced approach to dealing with our economic problems today. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to clause 12-a of rule 1, the chair declares the house in recess until noon today. >> we began providing televised access to the every day workings of congress and the tell -- and the federal government. c-span, created by table companies -- cable companies. >> on c-span we will take you live to capitol hill where the senate armed services committee is holding a hearing with the top military officials. in a are looking into budget requests from the military command. last week chuck hagel announced they wil
face cuts in funding this fiscal year. they research to treat diseases, and find new technologies to help the health of people worldwide. that's why i'm introducing the scientific research and innovation act. it will appropriate $ million for the -- for the remainder of 2013. n.i. shmplet the single largest source of biomedical research. it funds research efforts here in bethesda, at medical centers and cancer centers and universities across the nation. it generated $67.8 billion in economic jut put nashtewide in 2008 alone this work often take yearses and affects every family in america touched by serious health conditions an chronic disease. failure to adequately and consistently fund this research means lost lives, lost science and lost economic opportunity. the funding i propose will not increase the federal deficit. it is paid for by eliminating tax breaks for corporate jets. we must be clear about our priorities and values as a nation so the choice is clear, scientific advancement and curing disease or taxpayer support for corporate jets. choose nmple i.h. the speaker pro te
-valued jobs, jobs that require skills whether in science, technology, engineering and math or other areas of curriculum. the fact of the matter is, for young people, there is only one budget which speaks to them and addresses their needs. that's the democratic budget that is brought up by mr. van hollen and i yield back. the chair: the time of the gentleman has expired. the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. ryan: the interest rate was put in law by the democrats. if we bring legislation to the floor that is paid for like we did last year, i would assume we have every reason to believe we would pass it. i yield three minutes to the gentleman from wisconsin, a new member of the budget committee, mr. duffy. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for three minutes. mr. duffy: i'm happy to hear my friends across the aisle talking about investing in our future and our economy. when they talk about that, we have to declare that is code for borrowing and spending more money. and we should truly talk about the cost of this debt. we all know today that we owe $17 trillion in debt. and if the federal re
's talk about standards. you were talking about technological platforms. one of the reasons we got into trouble is the underwriting standards seem to go out of the window for several years. would you not agree? >> yes, sir. >> you have put back into place, which have led to the profitability of three organizations. >> yes, sir. >> what are the standards of this technological standard. senator wyden wrote a letter concerning lender processing services. were you involved in the litigation? were you involved in any of the settlements with lps? >> let me verify. we were believe involved in that litigation. >> what i would like you to do is to take a look at the role of lps and all of this. there was one platform, a technological platform, that was good when things were going smoothly. it was very hurried in terms of lawyers, processing enclosures. i asked for you all to take a look at this. i would be the missed if i did not bring up limits for you to say that that is in every aware i think if you exercise those calls, it would be a additional profitability to both fannie mae and fredd
to be one of the nations that sells technology to the world rather than buying it from the world. this is a huge leverage issue and i encourage my colleagues to support it. mr. sessions: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from alabama. mr. sessions: i request the senators who desire to speak against it speak at this moment. mr. president, i do believe and indicated last night, quoting mr. lunborg of europe who has done research on these issues, that energy research is preferable to mandating requirements that would utilize inefficient sources and subsidizing -- over subsidizing, and breakthroughs might happen. this is a paid-for amendment. i would, without objection, i would suggest we take it by voice vote. the presiding officer: the senator from washington. mrs. murray: if there is no objection, we're happy to take this by a voice vote. the presiding officer: if there is no further debate, all those in favor say aye. all those opposed say no. the ayes appear to have it, the ayes have it. the amendment is agreed to. mrs. murray: move to reconsider. the presiding o
Search Results 0 to 16 of about 17

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)